WASHINGTON'S LEADING BUSINESS MAGAZINE

The 100 Best Companies to Work For

What does it take to be a Best Company to Work For?
|   July 2010   |  FROM THE PRINT EDITION

This is the year that separates true best companies from
pretenders. An economic contraction the country hasn’t seen since the Great
Depression has put pressure on all aspects of a business. Layoffs, pay freezes
and cuts, benefits pruning—all have been the norm during these turbulent times.
Many employees are simply thankful to have a job, and are less concerned with
health club memberships and other perks.

The Judges

Rankings in the Best Companies to Work For were determined
in part by a panel of distinguished judges.

Al Lopus: President, Best Workplaces Institute

John Hartman: Executive coach, Waldron & Co.

Scott Ofstead: Vice president of human resources, Kibble
& Prentice

Nita Petry: Area president, Washington state, Gallagher
Benefit Services Inc.

Scott Rabinowitz: Managing director, Seattle, DHR
International

Josh Warborg: District president for Northwest operations,
Robert Half International

But there are standouts, as there always are. Some companies
realize that an investment in human capital can have a positive effect on the
bottom line. It can be something as simple as listening to the employees—that
is, management visiting each location, talking directly with the staff and
paying much more than lip service to what they say—or a comprehensive effort to
improve the health of the entire workforce. One company goes as far as to
publish its financials internally every month, so that all employees are given
the same picture of the firm’s health. Another funds an employee’s education,
whether or not it’s work related. Yet another issues each new employee a Nerf
gun for the occasional skirmishes that break out in the office.

These are the companies that have survived turbulent times
and managed to keep their employees happy. These are the Best Companies to Work
For.

Click below to see the lists:

Click below to read the stories:

(The small and midsize company lists have been updated to correct for an error in one company's size.)

Click here to see the photo gallery from our June 17 awards banquet.

Comments

non-profits

It would have been a better and more honest survey if former employees were surveyed. I mean the ones that left on good terms. One of your non-profits has a huge turnover rate…ever wonder why? Is it possible that logistically on paper they look great but why so many people left not one but several of their programs is disturbing?  Why someone who had been there for 20 years left so quickly she didn’t even pack all her belongings? Just saying. I think it’s just as important to get the real reason why people leave a company AND not through their exit interview which could ruffle feathers if they were actually honest. There are so many toxic work environments out there and by stroking their egos by adding them to a list of 100 Best, you enable the behavior and good people get stuck choosing between a job to take care of their family and gossip, back stabbing, name calling, micro management etc.  What a dis-service to Washington. The Survey needs to include current and former employees….maybe, (saying this very lightly) those who were terminated. Don’t you ever wonder what the REAL truth is? Washington is an “at will state” and people are afraid of that.  Many fear being honest. I did.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p><span><em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options